International Dentistry Journal (ISSN: 3065-4505) | Volume 4, Issue 1 | Case Report | Open Access DOI
Gagik Hakobyan*
Viktoria Margaryan1, Vladimir Margaryan2, Hovhannes Karapetyan3, Tigran Hakobyan4, Lyudmila Tatintsyan5, Gagik Hakobyan6*
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
2Toluca Dental Studio, Los-Angeles, USA
3Visiting lecturer Yerevan Sate Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia,
4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yerevan State Medical University ,Yerevan, Armenia,
5Department of Therapeutic Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
6Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
*Correspondence to: Gagik Hakobyan
Fulltext PDFObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of immediate implants replacing the teeth with periodontal lesions.Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 53 patients with periodontitis who underwent immediate implant placement from 2023 to 2025.The patients were randomly assigned into two groups:Group A 19 patients (12 males and 7 females, 42 to 58 years), periodontal treatment protocol - scaling and root planning (SRP)+Armenicum" paste, extraction of periodontally affected hopeless teeth and immediate implant placement.Group B 34 patients (16 males and 18 females, 37 to 65 years) extraction of periodontally affected hopeless teeth and immediate implant placement. A total of 287 Bio3 implants (GmbH, Germany) were administered after the removal of hopeless teeth with periodontal disease.All patients had assessed and indexed: bleeding on probing (BOP); probing pocket depth (PPD) and marginal bone loss (MBL) of the placed implants, at 6 months after 12 and 36 months. Patients were followed up at 12- month intervals.Results: Serious complications were recorded neither during operation or in the postoperative period. Postoperative monitoring of the patients showed no statistically significant differences were recorded average indices in Group A and Group B.The results of the implant-supported restoration satisfied the patients, meeting their functional and aesthetic requirements. The success rate of implants after 3 years in patients Group-A was 97.4% and in Group-B 96.9 %.
Conclusions: Immediate implants in patients with periodontitis is a predictable treatment method, and encouraging results can be achieved if the treatment protocols are followed.
Periodontitis; Immediate implants; Long-term effectiveness immediate implants
Viktoria Margaryan, Vladimir Margaryan, Hovhannes Karapetyan, Tigran Hakobyan, Lyudmila Tatintsyan, Gagik Hakobyan. Effectiveness of Immediate Implants in Patients with Periodontal Lesions. Int Dent Jour. 2025;4(1):1-12.