International Clinical and Medical Case Reports Journal (ISSN: 2832-5788) | Volume 4, Issue 9 | Research Article | Open Access DOI

Audit on Endometrial Cancer Hysterectomies against GIRFT and BADS Standards

Saira Waheed*

Specialty Registrar in Obstetrics & Gynaecology, York and Scarborough NHS Trust, Yorkshire

*Correspondence to: Saira Waheed 

Fulltext PDF

Abstract

Background: Hysterectomy is a common gynaecological procedure, with evolving practice favouring minimal access routes to improve patient outcomes. GIRFT recommends that no more than 25% of hysterectomies be performed as open procedures, with at least 50% of minimal access hysterectomies completed as day cases. Objective: To audit endometrial cancer hysterectomies performed at York site against GIRFT and BADS standards. Methods: A retrospective audit of 60 patients undergoing hysterectomy between January–December 2023 was conducted. Inclusion criteria: elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for endometrial cancer (n=27). Parameters included age, BMI, histology, cancer stage, planned and actual route of hysterectomy, blood loss, uterine size, conversion to open, and readmissions. Results: All patients were planned for TLH. Conversion to total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) occurred in 14%. Median age was 60 years (range 30–86). Most procedures were completed laparoscopically, with day-case rates below GIRFT/BADS targets. Conclusion: While the majority of procedures were performed laparoscopically, conversion rates and day-case completion fell short of GIRFT and BADS standards. Recommendations include structured patient pathways, morning listing, SOP-driven recovery and discharge, MDT involvement, and patient preparation strategies to optimise outcomes.

Keywords:

Citation:

Saira Waheed. Audit on Endometrial Cancer Hysterectomies against GIRFT and BADS Standards. Int Clinc Med Case Rep Jour. 2025;4(9):1-4.